 |
|
| Author |
Message |
hmmmm_maybe
Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 3967
Location: Kent
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ploppy wrote: | well, that might have been the case 10 years ago.
now, you have the net - and this is why we have soooo many different versions of events for the Sept 11.
if i was the govt, i imagine i would ignore people on here too - no-one will ever be happy with any enquiry, and why give my enimies the chance to try and cause me problems? |
They are working to try and regulate the net. This spread of uncensored info is a real pain in the butt for them. Did you know one 911 site logs government and security personal visiting it's site? If they're not woried what people see and talk about, then why the interest?
Did you also know popular mechanics, which debunks 911 conspiracy theories get's funding from 'official' sources? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ploppy
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 1661
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hmmmm_maybe wrote: | | Ploppy wrote: | well, that might have been the case 10 years ago.
now, you have the net - and this is why we have soooo many different versions of events for the Sept 11.
if i was the govt, i imagine i would ignore people on here too - no-one will ever be happy with any enquiry, and why give my enimies the chance to try and cause me problems? |
They are working to try and regulate the net. This spread of uncensored info is a real pain in the butt for them. Did you know one 911 site logs government and security personal visiting it's site? If they're not woried what people see and talk about, then why the interest?
Did you also know popular mechanics, which debunks 911 conspiracy theories get's funding from 'official' sources? |
why would "official" sources be automatically bad? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hmmmm_maybe
Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 3967
Location: Kent
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ploppy wrote: | | hmmmm_maybe wrote: | | Ploppy wrote: | well, that might have been the case 10 years ago.
now, you have the net - and this is why we have soooo many different versions of events for the Sept 11.
if i was the govt, i imagine i would ignore people on here too - no-one will ever be happy with any enquiry, and why give my enimies the chance to try and cause me problems? |
They are working to try and regulate the net. This spread of uncensored info is a real pain in the butt for them. Did you know one 911 site logs government and security personal visiting it's site? If they're not woried what people see and talk about, then why the interest?
Did you also know popular mechanics, which debunks 911 conspiracy theories get's funding from 'official' sources? |
why would "official" sources be automatically bad? |
Searching for the article, but here's another, doesn't talk of funding, does however state CIA involvement.
| Source wrote: | | A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. Pulling the strings is the grand dame of Hearst Magazines and behind the scene is her obscure husband a veteran propaganda expert and former special assistant to the director of the C.I.A. |
http://www.rense.com/general63/brutalpurgeofPMstaff.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ploppy
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 1661
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you cant fake science though |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hmmmm_maybe
Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 3967
Location: Kent
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ploppy wrote: | | you cant fake science though |
That's right you can't! You can silence scientists, but you can't fake the facts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Gumtree
Search
Register
Log in
Profile
Memberlist
FAQ
