Important:Every Parent should know

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Please think before automatically falling into any of it.

http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com/external/video.htm

Also Government ministers are looking over at white papers and considering vaccinating all young girls with a serum to prevent STD’s. It will be introduced by force and not choice.

If this mass vaccination programme leaves maternity problems later in life for these young girls, do you think there will be compensation for the families?

Always question government vaccination programmes.

Thank you.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=D1S25RCFKJTOFQFIQMGSFF4AVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2006/10/06/ucancer.xml

Amazing don't you think.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Free Information in which every parent should know.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/news/2723.html

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Here is the latest developments from the United States.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/business/21merck.html?_r=4&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1172015658-ZnY/5A3YiREYGi26iRi1Tw&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Its nice to see a lot of people are beginning to wake up to the facts that they could be risking their kids futures.

Again read a leisure.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Soon to arrive here in England?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dcd7-z3SriA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UitTjCXVNE0

englishman · Joined: 17 Jun 2006 Posts: 22736

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

To question anything that’s thrown at us is not yet a crime. Step by step, day by day our free civil liberties are slowly eroding. There are states in America that enforce vaccination programmes without giving the parent a choice.

Don’t you think it would be much more sensible to consider any risks that you could be taking with your child?

I am sure your memory serves you well to look back at the controversy when our very own prime minister found it so hard to tell us all about his youngest child have the 3-in- one jab. Some medical specialists blame Autism on that very same jab.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Why is it that our BBC does not mention anything of this on their TV bulletins? They cowardly slip important news that affects our children and us as parents under the public’s imagination.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6417565.stm

Should it really be people like me reporting these important issues?

It has been described from the Conservatives and Liberal as “Sinister”.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Finally one of my stories has made the headlines.

As a parent you should be asking yourself why would they be slipping “BANNED” additives into our children’s medicines.

Surely they are “BANNED” for a reason.

They must be a “DANGER” to our youngest most venerable.

Who will answer to this?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article1495075.ece

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6433897.stm

You should be concerned.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Banned substances still found in baby medicine.

There must be a risk and valid reason why certain substances are banned from our young vulnerable children.

Certain powers that are supposed to protect these youngsters have turned a blind eye and allow the continuation of these products into our baby’s medicines. It has been reported throughout the whole weekend.

Spokespersons were activated immediately on the radio, T.V and newspapers to calm the situation down before it blows out of proportion. What they didn’t say was they would immediately find the source and rectify the problem and clear the shelves in all the chemists and pharmacies.

I find it a very sneaky and dishonest of them to continue this practice.

The media again have covered this story shamelessly and dishonestly too. There were no calls for any immediate action whatsoever.

When something is banned it is banned for a very important reason. That’s why it is indeed banned.

The art of sweeping the whole story under the carpet is not to my surprise because it’s becoming common practice.

Again I must stress that it is you the guardian and parent of your child that should look-out for these peculiar goings-on.

englishman · Joined: 17 Jun 2006 Posts: 22736

and you just ask people to sit back and allow their daughters die from completely preventable cervical cancer

Gabrielle · Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 431 Location: Clapham Junction

I was treated for low grade cervical cancer at 24. This new vaccine is the best thing to happen for young women.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Gabrielle in respect of your very own story, I still think it is unnecessarily to compulsory subject young girls at such a young age of 11 whether they are sexually active or not. Nothing yet that we are producing it seems is full proof. Caution should be taken with youngsters before hand. Besides their bodies are still in the development stage and a compulsory vaccination programme could lead to complications of some kind at a later stage, not to mention the encouragement of under-age sex.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Women Friday and yesterday were warned about the dangerous amounts of alcohol they are consuming lately. The usual reminder about the damaging effects to the liver associated with alcohol was delivered.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/4180562.stm

So I read-up a little to find a little more information about this issue. It didn’t take me long to find another possible source or link that could be an associated contribution to the up surge of liver problems.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0314-03.htm

The BBC must have over-looked this possible link and proceeded with their usual rehearsed statement.
Surely it is time to call for a very reliable totally independent body to research this subject thoroughly. Greenpeace have raised a very good point but are as usual put down
from any contribution about most subjects. You sometimes get the sense that it is policy of the BBC to totally ignore their valid critical sometimes objective view points at all times.

Predicted repetitive statements at times can be looked at as frugal. A fresh approach to this issue could be the start of smart positive action.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

SHOCKED?

HORRIFIED??

....Finally bells are beginning to ring.

http://www.libdems.org.uk/news/fingerprinting-in-uk-schools-more-authoritarian-than-in-china-baroness-walmsley.12231.html

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

400,000 British children are now given Hyperactivity Drugs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/womenfamily.html?in_article_id=443431&in_page_id=1799

Parents have been convinced from certain authorities that its best if the child takes them.

With no questions asked, with side effects looming does this mean that these children will be given another drug with the existing drug eventually?

Is a child not just a child that misbehaves from time to time as we did?

I find this the start of a slippery-slope that will eventually become the norm if parents don’t wake-up to the facts.

Remember, there’s always a risk of complications for the child later in life if the side effects are long lasting or permanent.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

There seems to be a pattern emerging here.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6470939.stm

It seems that someone or a collection of organisations are so eager to administrate a large amount of drugs no matter the consequences.

I think you’ll find that we are all still here as parents and we were never exposed to these unnecessary jabs when we were teenagers.

Note the words used, “But Professor Adam Finn said there were other jabs which could benefit teens.
And he said issues over informed consent and parental control had to be addressed”.
He used the word “could” and also “issues over consent and parental control”.

ISSUES??

This will mean that the Government INTEND to make it compulsory in which he questions.

So what is really going on here?

AusPete · Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 7034 Location: West Midlands

if it wasnt for the seperate issue, I'd say you were "wishes", back again!

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

Pre-crime checks for kids at school.

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=42993&in_page_id=34

Is it a good thing?

Is this what we all voted for?

The information will be kept for life. Surely this will mean that certain kids will be prejudiced from certain parts of society.

The ENFORCMENT & CONTROL of our government has escalated to overwhelming proportions.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

If you don't know yet there is a Government web site that gives you a cross section of our society's reaction to Mr Blairs plans of screening (DNA & FINGER PRINTING) our kids.

You can add your comments by all means. Click below and enjoy.

http://www.parentscentre.gov.uk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=27&threadid=23687

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

It’s Monday and the latest news for us all is, ..wait for it…….An added drug in formula babies milk. Yes, It’s on its way.

The scientists behind this are saying that it will prevent your baby from developing obesity throughout the child’s life.
They say the drug has a special psychological power to affect the brain from having an over urge for food throughout its life.

We are always told to have a healthy diet and food intake, so what could the possibilities be?

Kids that refuse to eat would be more of a problem?? ..Your guess is as good as mine.

Side effects: I think we can safely say that every drug has a side effect. Some even long term.

Would you really give your child this added drug in the formula milk?

Please, Always be cautious because it’s your baby’s life and not the money-making drug companies. Besides aren’t there enough hormones floating around in our food-chain already?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6575767.stm

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

The old saying is “What you don’t see won’t hurt you”.

There are a lot of products that we are all familiar with, and a lot contain “ASPARTAME”.
• instant breakfasts
• breath mints
• cereals
• sugar-free chewing gum
• cocoa mixes
• coffee beverages
• frozen desserts
• gelatine desserts
• juice beverages
• laxatives
• multivitamins
• milk drinks
• pharmaceuticals and supplements, including over-the-counter medicines
• shake mixes
• soft drinks
• tabletop sweeteners
• tea beverages
• instant teas and coffees
• topping mixes
• yogurt
Like Fluoride this substance will not be discharged by the human body easily. It can stay in the body for many years, leaving millions with an array of ailments and long term sicknesses.
Birth Defects, Brain Cancer, Emotional Disorders, Epilepsy/ Seizures are all well known in the medical world but not to the general public. Whitewashing these important debates and issues seems to be the norm of late.
The Massive rise in Diabetes is one of the tell-tale signs of things getting out of hand.
Go and take a look right now to see if this substance is part of your or your child’s daily intake.

To reduce mass panic and businesses folding also shares dropping they conveniently sometimes refer it as a “soft poison”. It seems to have worked.

If our Medical Research Authority really cared, then why do they continue to let these suspect substances in our food chains?

Do your own research and make sure you tell your family and friends because what price is a whole healthy life?

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

So at last someone high-up within the government has recognise the dangers of food additives within children’s food and sweets.

There has always been for a long time a few voices trying to get heard about this subject. Some of Today’s front pages make it clear about the concerns.

The question now is, will the government be doing anything about it this time round or will it be shoved under the carpet so to speak.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

I know we will all find it very hard and difficult to avoid most of these suspicious products, but we can all only try.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/womenfamily.html?in_article_id=453431&in_page_id=1799

Government needs to look again into the array of positive criticism that makes a lot of sense. By being ignorant is a sure sign of not caring for our children as much as we should.

A lot of cancers could be avoided if we only made a real clear point to the right people. We have to start somewhere, so spread the knowledge around.

The Judge · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 109

SPILLING THE BEANS

There are certain companies that know exactly what dangers we face as human beings by eating GM crop produce.

You may remember there was a time when certain people said there is not enough food to feed everyone on the planet. This has now been replaced by making food cheaper to the consumer. Their push to get these products on our shelves ASAP has been a long hard slog, but is now paying off for them.

What is not ever mentioned is the fact that many of these products leave dormant chemicals in our guts that are reactivated as soon as they reach the gut that can cause harm in the long term. Certain Cancers may be one day be linked to these products.

I am a firm believer that prevention is always better than the cure. You have got to ask the question of why is it that the human being and its fellow nearby pets are in great numbers always related to cancers.

Under contract most Bio-Tech scientists are not allowed to reveal or discuss their findings on the downside of GM crop produce. Small pockets of scientists are now whispering behind the curtains about the effects of these GM crops and its filtering down into the general public.

The long term effects are disregarded and safety certificates of these products are usually easily passed among certain unknown officials.

Maybe it would help if much more transparency was evident instead of under cloak & dagger.

What ever happened to simple plain old natural food?

So please try to avoid these suspect food stuffs and give our kids a much well earned healthy start and chance in life instead of being just another guinea pig experiment.

The only person that won’t be pleased will be Dr Frankenstein and who cares about him?