Gumtree Forum Index
 
 GumtreeGumtree   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   Log inLog in   ProfileProfile   MemberlistMemberlist   FAQFAQ 

-be awere of it-the Instructor College -tIC
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 59, 60, 61  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gumtree Forum Index -> Services
Author Message
Lady D



Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Location: North

PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:22 pm    Post subject: RED Instructor Training Reply with quote

Hi everybody,

First of all im shocked to see so many people bickering and arguing on here. No wonder so many people are assuming they have done the wrong thing and have had the fear of god put into them!
To be honest i joined the Training with RED just over a year ago an its the best thing i ever did! I qualified in just under a year (could have done it quicker but took my time), and am now a fully fledged ADI with a full diary and love what i do. I did the home learning course and although failed my part 2 and my part 3 first go, did it on the second attempt.

If anybody on here has started training but been put off by all the arguing posted, just concentrate on yourself and getting qualified!!
Back to top
montyzuma
Community Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 7532

PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

before the allegations start
the lady doesnt appear to be a sock puppet
or at least not an obvious one, anyway.
Back to top
Lady D



Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Location: North

PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not a 'sock puppet' i assure u! Just trying to give some people a light at the end of there tunnel Smile
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Lady D,
Quote:
To be honest i joined the Training with RED just over a year ago an its the best thing i ever did! I qualified in just under a year (could have done it quicker but took my time), and am now a fully fledged ADI with a full diary and love what i do. I did the home learning course and although failed my part 2 and my part 3 first go, did it on the second attempt.

If anybody on here has started training but been put off by all the arguing posted, just concentrate on yourself and getting qualified!!

Agreed.

Putting people off who really want to become ADI's is not the point. It isn't what I've been trying to do and despite what RHPS may claim it is not my aim.


My aim is to make it plain that many DIT companies are interested primarily in making money and not much else. My problem with them is that in their rush to make profit they take in absolutely ANYONE whether there is a chance of them qualifying or not and do not give a fair and frank explanation of what qualification involves because doing so would affect their bottom line..

My view is that if you had the talent to qualify then you would have qualified whoever you went with but you are in a minority in that respect. To take on wide eyed innocents who have no knowledge of the industry and so can be convinced that qualification is easy and relatively quick while KNOWING that the pass rates are incredibly low amounts to misrepresentation and is wrong. Add in the idea of paying for the training with a loan and it just gets worse. People do pay for training with loans, fair enough, but when the pass rates are so low then I consider it grossly irresponsible to not only promote a loan facility but to encourage people to sign on the premise that they will almost certainly qualify and will do so in a reasonable timescale. I also believe it wrong to actively encourage customers to involve relatives in that loan agreement either as sponsors or guarantors for the same reason.

Good luck to you. I genuinely hope you do well and I would say that to anyone who puts their back into qualifying and surviving as an ADI. Just answer me three questions;

Are you aware of just how lucky you were statistically to qualify?

Do you think this is a course/job that would suit the majority of any DIT company's customers?

Knowing what you know about how difficult and time consuming it is to qualify, can you honestly recommend someone who is just chasing the £30K and sees becoming an ADI as a 'sit on your backside and talk' job to take out a loan and bank on qualifying quickly enough to pay the loan back out of their first years earnings?


Quote:
First of all im shocked to see so many people bickering and arguing on here. No wonder so many people are assuming they have done the wrong thing and have had the fear of god put into them!

So maybe we should all just stay quiet and let the no-hopers carry on getting sucked in?

I just want them to have the chance to make an informed decision, that's all.

RHPS, what's this Audi mania all about? Have you had a near death experience with one, or two, or three? It's BMW's with me. I used to have a 325i but even so I worry about some of the turkeys driving them these days.

Regards,

Dave.

MORE INFO FOR WANNABE INSTRUCTORS ON;

http://www.squidoo.com/driving_instructors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnhkyLYbqIY
http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/crt/drivertrainers/becomingadrivinginstructor/becomingadrivinginstructor.htm

Whatever you do, don't go to the following site, the guy wants £9.95 for a 16 page 'report' that is more than adequately covered on the squidoo website above;

http://www.drivinginstructortraininginfo.com/
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P.S,


By the way Lady D, we aren't bickering. I am supplying RHPS with reasoned, balanced and justifiable arguments and he is trying hard to keep up. Laughing

Welcome to the thread.

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm just going out on a lesson........ just wait, Dave Wink
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lady D, it is the avowed aim of those who are creating this doubt to damage Red - and anyone they suspect of being associated with them. All of Krazy Land (plus one senile old fool on an obscure money forum somewhere) has made it clear that's exactly what they want.

Whatever Saint Dave may try and claim - and this is something of a moving target where he's concerned, seeing as he pretended to be pro-Red when he first came in, then his true colours broke through bit by bit - this is the aim of these clowns.

At least 90% of Dave's posts have been specifically about Red and no one else. It is only on the last page or two he has changed tack (again!) - so don't be taken in by him Wink

Quote:
My view is that if you had the talent to qualify then you would have qualified whoever you went with but you are in a minority in that respect.

That's OK, Dave. I don't charge royalties for the use of my arguments from previously Laughing Even by hypocrites Wink

There is no obligation on companies to pile negative press on people to dissuade them from buying their product. Sorry, Dave, but that's the way it is.

I noticed something I wrote back in April when I was looking for info about that Passmasters rumour:
Quote:
Don't get bogged down, though, in what the schools aren't telling you: no company in the world advertises its services and then tries to put you off buying those services by telling you how bad things are.

The failure rate is well known if people look - but they only see what they want to see in the beginning. Then they start blaming others when reality hits home - that is what FPMI was referring to (covered in other current threads).

The one thing you have got to realise is that no matter how much you want something, you might not be cut out for it - or you may simply lose out on the luck of the draw.

This applies to everyone who has ever tried and failed/succeeded at the three exams. Whether we agree that the exams are discriminating or not, you have to pass them - and no matter who you train with there is a 94% failure rate.


Don't get me started on Audis, Dave. Without exception, every Audi driver in our galaxy is a total prat Laughing Same applies to plenty of other cars (notably Subarus and anything with blacked out windows or wide exhaust pipes) Laughing
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wide Dave wrote:
I am supplying RHPS with reasoned, balanced and justifiable arguments...


And then you woke up Laughing
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi RHPS,

Quote:
I'm just going out on a lesson........ just wait, Dave
_________________
RHPS

Am I waiting for something special? Will you be long? Laughing


Quote:
Quote:
Wide Dave wrote:
I am supplying RHPS with reasoned, balanced and justifiable arguments...

And then you woke up


As I recall saying at some point in the past;

Nice Comeback. Laughing

Quote:
Whatever Saint Dave may try and claim - and this is something of a moving target where he's concerned, seeing as he pretended to be pro-Red when he first came in, then his true colours broke through bit by bit - this is the aim of these clowns.

At least 90% of Dave's posts have been specifically about Red and no one else. It is only on the last page or two he has changed tack (again!) - so don't be taken in by him

I am STILL trying to love Red. They won't let me! They just carry on whizzing down the misrepresentation superhighway, snatching people like Yorkshire Bloke off the streets and taking all their money by telling them;

a) How great they are. (Which seems believable to ANY Yorkshireman anyway).

b) That they would have to be stupid to fail. (That MUST mean that most Yorkshiremen WILL fail). Laughing

If 90% of my posts have been about Red and no-one else and you find that strange then I'm extremely worried about you mate, for two reasons;

1) We are on a thread that is specifically ABOUT RED! Haven't you noticed? If I started to bang on about how crap the Royal Mail was then you would be quick off the mark at telling me I was on the wrong thread wouldn't you? If I slagged off 'Fred Bloggs School of Motoring' you would say 'what's he on, it must be good stuff'. I noticed in the thread index you wandered over to some thread about 'phones or broadband or something nerdy and techie, did you go on there and rant about Red or Facebookers? Laughing

2) I'm arguing with YOU and your one true love is RED! Can I help it if you spend your evenings sitting there rubbing your groin over a copy of Red's terms and conditions? Laughing

What else can we argue about? I can't argue with much else of what you write because you sound so incredibly like ME! That's probably why this has all gone on so long - irresistible force against immovable object and all that.

Geddit?

Quote:
That's OK, Dave. I don't charge royalties for the use of my arguments from previously Even by hypocrites

So now you claim copyright on all your comments! Why not copyright the individual words and then if that doesn't stop people from sounding too much like you you can buy the rights to the individual letters!

You'll be loaded in no time at all! Laughing
Quote:
There is no obligation on companies to pile negative press on people to dissuade them from buying their product. Sorry, Dave, but that's the way it is.

I'm not even talking about negative press. Just basic information. While I've been learning to fly almost everyone who knows has wanted to talk about crashes and so on. It hasn't stopped me wanting to fly and by the same token I don't believe that someone who really wants to do this job will be put off by the contents of a website or for that matter an ADI14 pack. I think they will see it as a challenge. Would LD have given up if she had sight of an ADI 14 pack or had a look at Squidoo? I doubt it very much and I doubt it because if you can cope with a series of tests that people can actually FAIL and come out of the process smiling then you aren't a quitter. A quitter won't get past Part 3.

Giving out good, basic information doesn't fit the business plan of a DIT company though does it. For fairly obvious reasons they do want ANYBODY to sign up. Those TV ads HAVE to be paid for and the no-hopers money is as good as anyones isn't it?

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have a look at Yorkshire Bloke on this link;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnhkyLYbqIY

And here is RHPS getting ready to set off for work in the morning, what a driver!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IacjiYGj9l4&feature=dir

Enjoy..................... Laughing
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Can I help it if you spend your evenings sitting there rubbing your groin over a copy of Red's terms and conditions?

...you sound so incredibly like ME!

It's better than just sitting there rubbing my groin. Eh? Laughing

Arguably, anything I write has copyright, doesn't it? But you miss my point: I wasn't claiming copyright - just illustrating how you totally ignored any possibility that it might exist in your continuing voyage on the Good Ship "Plagiarism" Wink

"Giving out good basic information" isn't something any company spends too much time on.

The only reason some smaller driving schools (and LDC) do it is that they are wetting themselves trying to publicise to every potential client how "bad" ALL the big schools are (and in LDC's case, especially Red) Rolling Eyes And we know that assumption is incorrect.
Back to top
chickengeorge



Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

based on the fact that I had just been given notice of redundancy, i attended the RED presentation and based on the main point that I would be up and earning money within 16 weeks I foolishly took the load option.

The tv advert says training to suit your needs.....................na.

15 weeks and be earning money............................na.

1 year to complete to level 2 as they have insufficient number of instructors.

Had to go with another school as I wasnt allowed anymore than 5 practical sessions.

Once I had passed the part 2 (first time) i now have to wait 14 weeks to complete the part three training (40 hrs).

M.P on the case.

I'm now in the unfortunate position of not being able to travel to the part 3 training sessions as I'm not working, so I advised RED.

RED sent me a job description asking me if I was interested in selling training courses eventhou I hadnt finished my training.

I wrote to RED again I cant afford to complete the course so they offered me two other venues further away from home....................der.

I WANT TO DO THIS but RED does not have the resources locally and have taken too long to deliver and havent delivered on their promises.

RED may be a good company to work for but they need tgo tell the truth and they need to rethink the money perhaps spread the cost, staged payments ???????
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think Lady D had the same experience, Chickengeorge.

I don't think Eddlad had the same experience.

Let's be honest. They didn't tell you you WOULD be up and running in 16 weeks (although I have never heard of this short a time before).They said COULD. I know of someone who did it in less than 6 months (not with Red), so it IS possible to do it quickly (though not likely). Their website says:
Quote:
How long does it take to qualify?

Our courses are structured around your progress and availability. From when you pass the first of the qualifying tests, you have up to two years to pass the final qualifying test. If you want to and we feel you have the ability, you can begin work as an Approved Driving Instructor very quickly. Alternatively, you can wait to start work until you pass the final qualifying test, allowing 6 to 9 months, depending on test date availability and course waiting times.

To me, that says to allow 6-9 months for Part 3 alone (don't forget one clown kept failing Part 1 and blamed this on Red). If it means all three parts then, like I said, it IS possible with a following wind (but not guaranteed)

The TV ad says training to suit your needs - but it is implied that these 'needs' must be reasonable, and becoming unemployed after committing to a loan much more than half your responsibility.

I think the bottom line here is that some people sign up and are prepared to be flexible in order to succeed.

Other people are inflexible and immediately blame Red (or other schools) for that.
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi chickengeorge, RHPS,

Quote:
based on the fact that I had just been given notice of redundancy, i attended the RED presentation and based on the main point that I would be up and earning money within 16 weeks I foolishly took the load option.

The tv advert says training to suit your needs.....................na.

15 weeks and be earning money............................na.

1 year to complete to level 2 as they have insufficient number of instructors.

Had to go with another school as I wasnt allowed anymore than 5 practical sessions.

Once I had passed the part 2 (first time) i now have to wait 14 weeks to complete the part three training (40 hrs).

M.P on the case.

I'm now in the unfortunate position of not being able to travel to the part 3 training sessions as I'm not working, so I advised RED.

RED sent me a job description asking me if I was interested in selling training courses eventhou I hadnt finished my training.

I wrote to RED again I cant afford to complete the course so they offered me two other venues further away from home....................der.

I WANT TO DO THIS but RED does not have the resources locally and have taken too long to deliver and havent delivered on their promises.

RED may be a good company to work for but they need tgo tell the truth and they need to rethink the money perhaps spread the cost, staged payments ???????

Quote:
based on the main point that I would be up and earning money within 16 weeks I foolishly took the load option.

'Foolishly', 'Loan option'. Isn't it strange how those two things seem to go together?
Quote:
training to suit your needs

Too variable, too open to interpretation. Doesn't mean a thing.
Quote:
15 weeks and be earning money

Can be done and so it could be said to be a legitimate claim. So far from reality that it could also be said to be complete bollocks as far as the average consumer is concerned. 'Red say they will qualify quickly but we know they won't' is basically what AntiLVG said in his recent post and most ADI's would echo that.
Quote:
1 year to complete to level 2 as they have insufficient number of instructors.

Had to go with another school as I wasnt allowed anymore than 5 practical sessions.

Once I had passed the part 2 (first time) i now have to wait 14 weeks to complete the part three training (40 hrs).

RED does not have the resources locally and have taken too long to deliver

They are clearly victims of their own success! The quality of the sales operation is clearly something that the operational instructor training side can't cope with. The proposition is just too good to pass up and people have been taking it more seriously than perhaps they should.

So maybe they should listen to you, chickengeorge and;
Quote:
they need tgo tell the truth

And that, chickengeorge seems to be the root of the problem. They did not give you fair, honest and complete information about what was facing you when you signed. It also make's a sick joke of their promise to 'train you until you pass' doesn't it? Train you until you pass but at their pace more like.

Ask yourself the questions;

Is it in Red's interest for you to qualify within 12 months?

Given that they already have your/Barclays money, is there any reason why they would want/need you to qualify? They clearly don't need you for the driving school side of their business which is quite small. Other driving schools don't need you, learner drivers don't need you, so why would Red want you to qualify or more to the point, why would they want to spend any more of your/Barclays money on training you than they need to?

It's incredibly simple. They are selling training courses and don't care what they have to do to get the signature on the dotted line. Once they have the money they will tend to spend as little as possible on training and have no incentive to get you to qualified status. I'm sure the trainers will try their best and in some cases such as LD or Eddlad they put the effort in. But they can't work miracles and some of the customers they have to deal with are not made of the right stuff. They are also asked to do too much in many cases and so Red's customers will find that training availability is limited as you have, CJ.

chickengeorge, do you feel that you have had £3,800 worth of training? work out the number of hours and value the materials you have had from Red. What do you think all that should cost?

None of this is difficult to work out. It's a classic case of 'selling the dream' and so many people are falling for it. It is so predictable that you could legitimately call it a scam and describe the successful trainees as a 'loss leader'.

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi chickengeorge, RHPS,

chickengeorge wrote;
Quote:
RED sent me a job description asking me if I was interested in selling training courses eventhou I hadnt finished my training.


and from a previous post;
Quote:
Eileen wrote at 06:55 on 26 October 2009
oh n did i mention i got a letter off them asking me to join them as a sale consultant!!!! the audacity of these people!!!

So possibly Red are more interested in selling courses than in training customers.

Disturbing that their salespeople may well be people who are not themselves either ADI's or trainers and do not know enough about ADI training to give out good, solid information about the product they sell.

Isn't it funny how so many of them claim to be ex-police. I've heard that a number of times myself and it is something that is mentioned often on other sites by Red customers. Trying to establish trust?

Are they also losing salespeople so fast that they are having difficulty replacing them?

It would seem so and AntiLVG's post might just give the reason.

Perhaps they can't handle the deceit.

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wide Dave wrote:

And that, chickengeorge seems to be the root of the problem.

Erm. No, Dave it isn't. It's you twisting the information (which is already partly twisted) so it fits perfectly into the gap in your own prejudiced view.

There is one simple issue here (assuming CG isn't playing games and trying to spring something):

HE SIGNED UP TO A LOAN, KNEW HIS JOB WAS AT RISK, LOST HIS JOB AS EXPECTED, AND NOW WANTS OUT OF THE LOAN.

The only thing you should be worrying your empty little head over here, Dave, is how people in this position can so easily get loans (for ANY purpose). It has nothing to do with Red.

It might be "disturbing" to hear this and hear that - but it would be far more interesting if we actually knew whether it was true or not.

RED'S WEBSITE MAKES IT RELATIVELY CLEAR WHAT TO EXPECT AND THIS IS NOT THE 16 WEEKS FROM INITIAL SIGN UP TO PASSING PART 3 THAT SOME CLAIM. IT'S THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE, DAVE. JUST LIKE YOU WANTED Rolling Eyes

One of my pupils is waiting for a CRB check to come back so she can start a job in a nursing home - so far she has been waiting about 8 weeks. Rolling Eyes

I love the way your inferior mind immediately draws a line between "advertising for staff" and "going bust" Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

For the record, sales staff don't need to be ADIs. It'd be a frightening waste of training if they ended up selling stuff like that, wouldn't it? It's your twisted mind which simultaneously believes CG's suggestion that they SHOULD be ADIs without rationalising it Rolling Eyes You just jumped on a negative vibe and ran with it - without realising it was burning you Laughing

IT WOULD BE CRAZY IF SALES STAFF HAD TO BE ADIS. IT WOULD BE LIKE INSISTING A DOUBLE-GLAZING SALESMAN HAD TO BE THE SAME GUY WHO BUILT THE FRAME, MINED THE ORE WHICH WAS USED IN THE FRAME, MADE THE GLASS, ETC.

More possibly, the point is that Red could have been trying to help someone who couldn't carry on training at this time by giving them a sales job. I suppose that positive slant never occurred to anyone, did it? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
RedAlert



Joined: 01 Feb 2009
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Below are some direct quotes from the brochure TIC/Red handed out some 12 months ago:

“The career is as recession proof as they come”
“There is a national shortage of qualified Driving Instructors set to become even more acute”
“You can start work as a trainee instructor in as little as 12 weeks.”
“Alternatively, you can wait to start work until you pass the final qualifying test, taking around 20 weeks”

I must admit to being pursuaded to some degree by RHPS argument since I last posted. As RHPS says what can you expect from a commercial company they obviously wants your money to pay all its sales staff and its share holders etc. Oh and its trainers if anything is left after spending millions on TV advertising and the like. At least they are not as bad as the adjustable bed salemen recently featured on Watch dog. I think RHPS is right to say Red is doing nothing illegal as in common law I believe it is stated "caveat emptor" - let the buyer beware. As the old saying goes a fool and his money are easily parted. If it looks to good to be true it probably is. It is up to the public to look beyond the salesman hype and do their own research. At lease speak to three or four other companies offering the same service and never buy on impulse especially if you can not afford to lose £3,800 or more if take out the loan.
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi RHPS,

Quote:
Anonymous said...
went for the RED talk yesterday 27/10/09. the fees are different up and down the country apparently this is why they arn not in brochure. The staff member claimed to be ex-police with a degree.

Also this may or may not be common practice but was told there was a £1000 cash back on compleating the course but only if i signed up by the end of the week?

Reading all of these articles i will be ringing red to cancel my short practicle test and will persuie it through an indipendant company

This articel has saved me around £4200 (£3800 TO TRAIN WITH RED AND ROUGHLY £500 APR THROUGH RED FINANCE OPTION)

1:44 AM

As another poster on the same site said, the fees are not in the brochure because they don't want you to be scared off or compare them with other companies. Red in some cases cost around £2,000 more than other companies for no appreciable benefit. The cashback incentive is there so that you will sign before getting the chance to compare Red's fees with anyone else's and possibly(although I can't prove it) because they may hope that you don't know the correct procedure for cancelling the contract during the cooling off period. The length of time taken for CRB checks will also cause you a problem if you only find out when you start training that the job isn't for you.

Quote:
Anonymous said...
Hi, Just to add to the sensible comments many have made here, I wanted to add my tuppance worth... Am a disabled person, but no restrictions on my licence. Wanted to train to be ADI so I could perhaps help other disabled people or dyslexic people to learn to drive. Now, I never expected the training to be a walk in the park, but have been studying something else for the last 18 months, so I had kind of proved to myself that I could succeed. Again, not wanting to earn mega money, just a sensible wage, perhaps working for 30-35 hours a week, eventually helping disabled people, maybe with extra training on my part. I attended RED's what-was-supposed-to-be-a-one-to-one informal chat, and found myself in a seminar with lots of others. Now, I will have to make up fictional places and people here, to protect everyone's identity, but, Ohhh, Lord, the person 'selling' this wonderful new career (foolpoof), let's call her Helga.. I have never seen such drama, dreadful acting, complimenting the group, even telling us she loved us all. At one stage I nearly fell for it, (only nearly), but I won't go in to something with my eyes wide shut, I asked questions. I made a nuicance of myself. I said that I WILL take my time IF I decide to train... (Ohhhh!! [[Shudder]]..."But Drew, I'm in the business of gimving, YES, GIVING people the most lucrative career, and a job that is SO easy! "Yes, well I'll be the judge of that"... Booked my "Test-Ride" with a trainer, and then cancelled a couple of days later, as the whole thing was just so so tacky, surreal. The Red "Actor"... I honestly can't believe how anyone else in the room would have bought the training, signed on the dotted line, etc., but many were hooked, young guys, older guys (probably ADIs under cover)! Anyway, phoned RED's office to kindly ask them to cancel (due to personal circumstances) an the phone operator replied, even though I was apologetic, "Right, fine, Goodbye.... Clink..."

For goodness sake, all the people here who have been burned by this horrible money grabbing, let's really get the word out and lets see who the legitimate companies are and hopefully we can get some common sense back into an industry, where, to be frank, you have to want to help people, teach them, equip them, etc. BTW, thanks those who have said about doing parts 1 and 2 yourself, I may well do that, and if I don't do well, maybe I'm not cut out for it.

11:43 PM

Salespeople who perhaps should be more focused on giving good, sound advice than selling a course that for the vast majority of customers is unsuitable, overly expensive and dooms them to failure and debt. Why not deal with a company who can give you an actual ADI to answer your questions rather than someone who has been dragged in off the street? When I went to BSM to discuss my training I spoke to an actual ADI and I got the truth, totally unvarnished and straightforward. I still signed whereas a no-hoper would probably not. I think that's a good thing.
Quote:
Robert Tucker said...
I took out an interest free loan in Jan 09 with Barclays for an intensive ADI course with Redcost £4200 after Jan 2010 in excess of £7000. The salesperson Tracy from Bristol said laughingly only way out of this contract is to die or heart attack. Had heart attack in April 09 before course had to cancel. Further heart problems in Oct 09 have tried to get loan repaid to Barclays as I am unable to do the course I cant concentrate and my nerve gone. Redcars attitude is tough luck no cash back Course kept open indefinatly lived on sickpay £64 PW since april still of work will probably file for bankruptcy Jan 2010. LEAVE WELL ALONE

4:07 PM

Beggars belief!
Quote:
concerned said...
Do you know how many people simply stop paying organisations like RED?
While this is not the wisest way to get out of their clutches, it is understandable.
I have already illustrated a breakdown of the cost of signing up with these people. Quickly, common sense will tell you that £30,000 TURNOVER is not your income. If you pay £4000.00 back over one year, £300 a week franchise fees will bring the payout to £19,600, £2000 a year for fuel, and approximately £1000 for food (because you will soon find the disadvantages of carrying sandwiches etc), £1000 per year (approx NI contributions)and possibly £3000.00 to put aside for income tax. (Check this sum:4000+15,600+2000+1000+1000+3000=£26,600, 30,000 - 23600 = £6,400 profit). This assumes that sufficient lessons will be directed towards your diary at £25 per lesson this would mean you would have to guarantee to have a minimum average 24 lessons per week if you want to have 3 weeks off during the year for holidays and Christmas - you won't afford to be ill!
Take the franchise agreement to a solicitor who specialises in this sort of thing if the maths are ok - DO NOT LET RED OR ANY ORGANISATION PERSUADE YOU TO SIGN WITHOUT TAKING THIS STEP!!! when and if the lawyer says don't touch it with a barge pole take his/her advice.
Talk to other people, search the web for people who have experienced the same situation and remember the old saying caveat emptor - let the buyer beware.
I did twenty years as a driving instructor, the last five years at grade six. I saw it all in that time. The bankruptcy figures for driving instructors are very high.

Can't vouch for the figures but there is a lot of truth in there for a new instructor.

Regards,

Dave.

For anyone who fancies the job don't let any of this put you off but go in with your eyes wide open. Take a look at these sites before you think about signing up for anything;

http://www.squidoo.com/driving_instructors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnhkyLYbqIY
http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/crt/drivertrainers/becomingadrivinginstructor/becomingadrivinginstructor.htm

Whatever you do, don't go to the following site, the guy wants £9.95 for a 16 page 'report' that is more than adequately covered on the squidoo website above;

http://www.drivinginstructortraininginfo.com/
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi RedAlert,

Quote:
I think RHPS is right to say Red is doing nothing illegal as in common law I believe it is stated "caveat emptor" - let the buyer beware.


Just because RHPS says it doesn't mean it's true.

http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2008/draft/ukdsi_9780110811574_en_2#pt2-l1g3

Take a look at the 'Misleading commercial practices and unfair trading regulations 2008' where it says quite plainly that companies have to tell the truth about the products and services they sell and that includes telling the customer the bad stuff as well as the good stuff. RHPS decided that this legislation was 'not important as part of the bigger picture' but it's actually the law and tends to mean that a company can not rely on bleating 'Caveat Emptor' every time they are caught being economical with the truth.

Any DIT organisation might also be said to have special knowledge or skill when dealing with consumers who have little knowledge of the DIT industry or qualification process AND can expect that the consumer would rely on the opinion of the DIT company in making a decision to enter into a contract.

Quoting Lord Denning (again);

'If a man who has or professes to have special knowledge or skill, makes a representation by virtue thereof to another........ with the intention of inducing him to enter into a contract with him, he is under a duty to use reasonable care to see that the representation is correct....... If he negligently gives unsound advice or misleading information or expresses an erroneous opinion, and thereby induces the other side into a contract with him, he is liable (in negligent misstatement).

Put simply, it appears that 'Caveat Emptor' as a principle does not apply to situations where a company is dealing with a consumer and that the company has a duty to explain their product/contract fully and openly before a contract is formed.

If I were a DIT company, and if I wanted to get around that, I would employ people who didn't know what they were talking about to sell the courses and get rid of them at regular intervals so that nothing could be proved or blamed on the company should anyone want to make a complaint. In short, I would introduce deniability to the equation.

I can't imagine a responsible and caring company doing that though, can you?

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like another assualt is on the cards Rolling Eyes

RedAlert, have you ever thought of what "Recession Proof" actually means? The recession has actually caused an INCREASE in people looking to learn to drive because it improves their chances of finding work. I'm sure you won't like that, but it is a fact - my workload as skyrocketed both in number of pupils wanting to learn and numbers of people wanting to become ADIs.

The "shortage" is certainly no less a shortage than it was when they made that claim, therefore. As the famous "Tv program which would spill the beans forever and everyone will hate Red and know they are right as a result" showed, Red believes it can stand by its claims. My own experience as an ADI would suggest it can't be dismissed outright.

The same is true of any claims it makes for how long it takes to train - so long as you don't take it literally and read it as "you WILL qualify in 12 weeks" (which is what you are hinting at) Wink I'm pretty sure that at some point the waiting times for tests in some areas of the country HAVE beenen enough for any such claims to be made. The fact is they don't say YOU WILL qualify in 12 weeks. That WOULD be wrong. But they DON'T say it, do they? No. They DON'T Laughing

20 weeks? The website clearly says 6-9 months now, and it suggests this is Part 3 alone, though it could mean asll three parts. The fact of the matter is that any claims it made in the past are superseded by the claims it makes now Rolling Eyes

Examples of this obviously difficult concept for you:

Example Of Victorian Advertising 1894 - #1 wrote:
Cigares de Joy cure Asthma
'Joy's Cigarette's afford immediate relief in case of asthma, wheezing, winter cough, and hay fever, and, with a little perseverence, effect a permanent cure. Universally recommended by the most eminent physicians and medical authors. Agreeable to use, certain in their effects, and harmless in their action, they may be safely smoked by ladies and children.'

Wilcox and Co.


Example Of Victorian Advertising 1893 - #2 wrote:
Gell's Dalby's Carminative
'This well-known and valuable cure for diarrhoea, symptoms of cholera in adults and the painful convulsions
and wind in the bowels of infants, which carry off so many under three years of age.'

Francis Newbery & Sons.


Just because someone said it doesn't make it true unless there is evidence and it can be supported Wink
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bit of confusing information there, Dave.

£500 on top of £3,800 does not equate to a £30% APR - so someone is talking rubbish somewhere. You'd have to pay it back within 12 months to get an APR anywhere near that (£600 payable in interest), and the whole point of the loan is to spread it over a minimum of 3 years (£1,750 payable in interest) or up to 5 years (£3,100 payable) in order to keep the monthly payments low.

That figure of "£2,000 more than Red" is nonsense. You are making things up.

Your company would charge a typical punter at least £1,800 for Part 3 alone (and I'm using an hourly rate of £30 for that - I bet you charge somewhat more). Add another £600 for Part 2, and the £2,400 you come up with does not seem so far away from Red's ALL IN/TRAIN YOU INDEFINITELY offer Rolling Eyes

Add exam fees (£700 if you take three tries at Parts 2 and 3) and any re-training costs (say 5 hours per failed attempt = £600) and you come to a total of around £3,700. And just look how much that goes up to if your hourly rate is £35, £40... or more Laughing

What's Red, again? Oh, yes. £3,800 for indefinite training until you pass Laughing

If you're going down the route of talking specifics, at least try to get one or two facts right Wink
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Do you know how many people simply stop paying organisations like RED?

Dave, just refusing to pay something you signed up to and agreed to pay by legal arrangement isn't admirable to anyone except these uber-idiots you have sided with!

What kind of ill-thought out crap is this that you are now supporting, merely because it is negative towards Red?

If you are stupid enough to sign a legal agreement to obtain a loan when your job is at risk (or you are far thicker than you allowed for and try to drop out of the course after you sobered up), then the only way of handling the payments legally is by credit management (through an agent or by being a little more reasonable when dealing with the bank).

Anyone who just "refuses to pay" deserves everything they have coming - and that includes the inevitable County Court judgement, which will screw them up for the next 7 years at least.

The uber-idiot (with a major chip on his shoulder as an ex-ADI) you quoted has also pontificated about needing 24 hours minimum as if this is Red's fault... welcome to the world of SELF-EMPLOYMENT, you imbecile Laughing

Bankruptcy among driver instructors is high because of the level of idiocy among them.

Those who go bankrupt are just poor at business. They went solo when they should have gone franchise. They didn't work out what they needed to do to break even, and just assumed they would. And they believed the ill-informed hype from other morons (other driving instructors) who advised them to do it that way.

The sad fact is that the "way it was" 20 years ago for an ADI meant that you'd have to be plankton to not succeed.

Nowadays the required level is somewhat higher - and the quality of the input is generally totally planktonic Wink
Back to top
RotHeissPfefferStreber
 
 


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 619
Location: Bavarian Forest

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave, I see you are rattling on about that bloody legislation again Rolling Eyes

Wake me up when Red is found guilty of breaching it. Then I might listen Laughing

In the meantime:

RED IS NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS.
Back to top
Russet Guzzler
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 1565
Location: Near Stokey Fire Station

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RotHeissPfefferStreber wrote:


RED IS NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS.

They've been very publicly accused of being misleading, money-grabbing scheisters, though, and I've not seen any litigation by them countering these accusations

I'd certainly be wary
Back to top
Wide Dave
 
 


Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 367
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi RHPS, RedAlert, RussetGuzzler and all,

Quote:
RedAlert, have you ever thought of what "Recession Proof" actually means? The recession has actually caused an INCREASE in people looking to learn to drive because it improves their chances of finding work. I'm sure you won't like that, but it is a fact - my workload as skyrocketed both in number of pupils wanting to learn and numbers of people wanting to become ADIs.

It's certainly true in the case of potential ADI's where people have a wad of redundancy money and no job. Such people go for an 'easy' job like driving instruction because anyone can apply and train. We can see it is obvious that there is no shortage of applicants.

In the case of new instructors hitting the market times are hard. I don't advertise but I can get a 'phone call out of the blue from someone whose daughter or son I taught years ago to teach the next one in line. I can trace one of my current learners back as a recommendation through 15 previous customers over several years and any successful ADI will agree that isn't too unusual. A new instructor hasn't got that and although I agree totally with your point about the bankruptcy cases being 'poor at business' these people are at the arse end of the market and don't have the flexibility or experience to recruit new business or to hang on to the business they get in the face of competition from other new instructors. They often go down the route of giving special offers such as 'first 5 lessons £56' or 'First 10 lessons £99' to quote 2 current offers. Such offers attract the type of customer who thinks cheapest is best and wants the absolute minimum number of lessons followed by a test taken too early. All this does is keep the new ADI at the arse end of the market and sends them deeper into debt. It's ONE of the reasons why I think it's stupid to take out a loan to pay for DIT courses because the debt is hanging over you as you try to build your business up in the early years. In that respect I think it's extremely irresponsible even to OFFER loans for such courses.

I don't give a toss about the figures in the post above. The point is that 'train until you pass' is largely a sick joke and that makes Red bloody expensive compared to other DIT companies in addition to which it doesn't seem to be delivering the goods. People are complaining about not getting enough training which would tend to suggest that they aren't getting enough training. Could it be that Red is 'overtrading', that is taking on more work than they can cope with? The signs are certainly there and if that is the case then they may end up with a loss of confidence among their customers which could ultimately snowball.

If Red has changed it's information on it's website then I am not claiming the credit. The credit for that is plainly due to the legislation which you repeatedly seek to dismiss. Red's advertising and legal people are obviously much more aware of the possible ramifications than you are when you write crap like;
Quote:
Dave, I see you are rattling on about that bloody legislation again

Wake me up when Red is found guilty of breaching it. Then I might listen

In the meantime:

RED IS NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS.

I have to be honest. I sort of admire Red's advertising and legal people. They are very sharp and have kept Red out of the shit for a long time. It would be incredibly easy to make simple but huge mistakes in the course of setting up and running that business and Red as a company should thank it's lucky stars that they have those people in harness.

Quote:

Quote:
Do you know how many people simply stop paying organisations like RED?

Dave, just refusing to pay something you signed up to and agreed to pay by legal arrangement isn't admirable to anyone except these uber-idiots you have sided with!

What kind of ill-thought out crap is this that you are now supporting, merely because it is negative towards Red?

I'm not supporting that course of action and neither, it would appear is the chap who wrote the original post because if you had bothered to quote properly and not selectively you would have also included his next line;
Quote:
While this is not the wisest way to get out of their clutches, it is understandable.

Once again you are resoundingly GUILTY of putting words in someone else's mouth in a vain attempt to discredit a point of view you don't like.

Childish. The sort of thing a 15 year old would try. Laughing

You haven't been very good today. I think you are capable of much more if only you would try harder. Laughing

Your public deserves it.

Regards,

Dave.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gumtree Forum Index -> Services All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 59, 60, 61  Next
Page 56 of 61

 






Forum Terms & Conditions


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group