Gumtree Forum Index
 
 GumtreeGumtree   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   Log inLog in   ProfileProfile   MemberlistMemberlist   FAQFAQ 

Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gumtree Forum Index -> Gumtree Community Chat
Author Message
Russet Guzzler
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 1565
Location: Near Stokey Fire Station

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:26 pm    Post subject: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?
Back to top
skryer
 
 


Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 6047
Location: Obscurity

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused
Back to top
Russet Guzzler
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 1565
Location: Near Stokey Fire Station

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused

Does any terrorist discriminate in pursuit of their overall objective?
Back to top
AntUasalCeart
 
 


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 13946
Location: Dublin

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He got grassed up to Mr Fawkes.

But you do have a point.
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?
Back to top
AntUasalCeart
 
 


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 13946
Location: Dublin

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.


Which church? Were you there?
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

bangon wrote:
AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.


Which church? Were you there?



Did he get the certificate about her Baptisim?
Back to top
AntUasalCeart
 
 


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 13946
Location: Dublin

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

bangon wrote:
AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.


Which church? Were you there?


Guy was baptised in the church of St. Michael le Belfrey on 16 April 1570 as a three-day-old baby

No I was washing me hair that day
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.


Which church? Were you there?


Guy was baptised in the church of St. Michael le Belfrey on 16 April 1570 as a three-day-old baby

No I was washing me hair that day



Hail Mary 100000 times for you not being there. May be thats why Mr Fawkes was so rebelled.
Back to top
Freddo
 
 


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 14482

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. He converted to a Catholic.
2. He attempted to blow up Protestants including James I, however there were just as many Catholic Aristocrats at Parliament so if it would have happened according to plan there would have been a massive knock on effect.

anyway, he was rubbish, we love burning him, i even piss on him afterwards.
Back to top
Allybok
 
 


Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 473
Location: Leicester, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

avarage Friday night for you hey Freddo! piss on some guy mwhahahaha Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
Freddo
 
 


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 14482

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Allybok wrote:
avarage Friday night for you hey Freddo! piss on some guy mwhahahaha Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad


Oh funny funny aint ya !!

You must have heard bad things about me, all incorrect Very Happy
Back to top
Allybok
 
 


Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 473
Location: Leicester, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freddo wrote:
Allybok wrote:
avarage Friday night for you hey Freddo! piss on some guy mwhahahaha Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad


Oh funny funny aint ya !!

You must have heard bad things about me, all incorrect Very Happy


glad to hear it. so what shannigans are you up to tonight?
Back to top
Vick
 
 


Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 13743

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Is burning the Guy offensive to Roman Catholics? Reply with quote

AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
AntUasalCeart wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
Russet Guzzler wrote:
The capture, torture and execution of a Roman Catholic terrorist is celebrated here by burning effigies of Guy Fawkes

Supposing Bin Laden or Abu Hamza were captured and then tortured and killed, would the authorities stop public rejoicing here in case Islam was upset?


Was Mr fawkes a RC terrorist, really? If he wanted to blow up James 1, wasn't he a closet Catholic, or Roman Catholic.

Confused.com Confused



Was Mr Fawkes baptisted?


He was when he was 3 days old.


Which church? Were you there?


Guy was baptised in the church of St. Michael le Belfrey on 16 April 1570 as a three-day-old baby

No I was washing me hair that day


Back to top
Freddo
 
 


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 14482

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Allybok wrote:
Freddo wrote:
Allybok wrote:
avarage Friday night for you hey Freddo! piss on some guy mwhahahaha Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad


Oh funny funny aint ya !!

You must have heard bad things about me, all incorrect Very Happy


glad to hear it. so what shannigans are you up to tonight?


Gonna stop off at my local, meet my mates, have 3 or 4 bottles, game of pool then get home to see my little ones before they go to bed.

This is as long as i dont get sidetracked by anyone.
Back to top
Allybok
 
 


Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 473
Location: Leicester, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sounds top banana Freddo. I might set some fireworks off tonight weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee BOOMM!!!

Yeah
Back to top
miss devil
 
 


Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 1596

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

there was some numpty in my local pqper last night that changed his name to guy fawkes by deed poll Shocked
Back to top
Sweet_Jesus
 
 


Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2277
Location: Formerly of Nazareth but get about a bit more now thanks to low cost airlines

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freddo wrote:
1. He converted to a Catholic.
2. He attempted to blow up Protestants including James I, however there were just as many Catholic Aristocrats at Parliament so if it would have happened according to plan there would have been a massive knock on effect.

anyway, he was rubbish, we love burning him, i even piss on him afterwards.


Shame on you

DOWN WITH THAT SORT OF LANGAUGE IF YOU DON'T MIND! Not talking
Back to top
MisterMassacre



Joined: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guy Fawkes did 9/11
Back to top
skryer
 
 


Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 6047
Location: Obscurity

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems that the real instigater was A certain Mr Rob Catesby!

Quote:
Before the Gunpowder Plot, Catesby was involved with the Earl of Essex in the failed attempt to remove Elizabeth I from power in 1601. He was not executed because of his small role, but was heavily fined, costing him his manor house in Chastleton.


You can just imagine him having to defend himself at trial and explain what role he played in Liz's 'removal from power'

welllll, I was going to drive the getaway erm, stagecoach?!

possibly after only being recognised for having a "small role" in this plot, he wanted to progress when the next monarch came to power?

sure enough>

Quote:
was the leader of the Gunpowder Plot.


but, we've all grown rather fond of the name Guy Fawkes now!

so, although his role might have been significant, we don't really remember him.

Posterity rules!

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
skryer
 
 


Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 6047
Location: Obscurity

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

also, did you know that Sir Walter Ralegh was also implicated as one of the plotters.?
So, off he went to the Tower. He was going to be executed, and although everybody hated him, they didn't want to loose him, so he was sent back.
He lived to tell the tale, but was imprisoned for some 15 years.
When released he was told (by James 1) not to go plundering Spanish ships, laden with rich cargoes/treasures/spices from the far east etc.
Sadly, once a Pirate always a Pirate was his motto, and he couldn't quit the habit.
(In those days there were no counselling sessions/therapy groups/patches to wear, nor self help books by Paul McKenna entitled "How to quit pirateering in 7 days").
...and so it was that Sir Walt got into conflict with some Spanish, returned back to England, and was beheaded

He seems to have fared a lot better than the 1st (or one of the 1st) colony of New World settlers which he abandoned in America though - they were all slaughtered (some very slowly) by local Indians!

Shocked
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skryer wrote:
also, did you know that Sir Walter Ralegh was also implicated as one of the plotters.?
So, off he went to the Tower. He was going to be executed, and although everybody hated him, they didn't want to loose him, so he was sent back.
He lived to tell the tale, but was imprisoned for some 15 years.
When released he was told (by James 1) not to go plundering Spanish ships, laden with rich cargoes/treasures/spices from the far east etc.
Sadly, once a Pirate always a Pirate was his motto, and he couldn't quit the habit.
(In those days there were no counselling sessions/therapy groups/patches to wear, nor self help books by Paul McKenna entitled "How to quit pirateering in 7 days").
...and so it was that Sir Walt got into conflict with some Spanish, returned back to England, and was beheaded

He seems to have fared a lot better than the 1st (or one of the 1st) colony of New World settlers which he abandoned in America though - they were all slaughtered (some very slowly) by local Indians!

Shocked



very interesting! good knowledge of it!!! Wink
Back to top
skryer
 
 


Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 6047
Location: Obscurity

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
also, did you know that Sir Walter Ralegh was also implicated as one of the plotters.?
So, off he went to the Tower. He was going to be executed, and although everybody hated him, they didn't want to loose him, so he was sent back.
He lived to tell the tale, but was imprisoned for some 15 years.
When released he was told (by James 1) not to go plundering Spanish ships, laden with rich cargoes/treasures/spices from the far east etc.
Sadly, once a Pirate always a Pirate was his motto, and he couldn't quit the habit.
(In those days there were no counselling sessions/therapy groups/patches to wear, nor self help books by Paul McKenna entitled "How to quit pirateering in 7 days").
...and so it was that Sir Walt got into conflict with some Spanish, returned back to England, and was beheaded

He seems to have fared a lot better than the 1st (or one of the 1st) colony of New World settlers which he abandoned in America though - they were all slaughtered (some very slowly) by local Indians!

Shocked



very interesting! good knowledge of it!!! Wink


It was in the book I just finished - i find it all so fascinating!
It claims that it was only thanks to Pocahontas, that the some English settlers had any chance there (although not all of them survived).
History Rocks my world! Razz
Back to top
bangon
 
 


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 83308
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skryer wrote:
bangon wrote:
skryer wrote:
also, did you know that Sir Walter Ralegh was also implicated as one of the plotters.?
So, off he went to the Tower. He was going to be executed, and although everybody hated him, they didn't want to loose him, so he was sent back.
He lived to tell the tale, but was imprisoned for some 15 years.
When released he was told (by James 1) not to go plundering Spanish ships, laden with rich cargoes/treasures/spices from the far east etc.
Sadly, once a Pirate always a Pirate was his motto, and he couldn't quit the habit.
(In those days there were no counselling sessions/therapy groups/patches to wear, nor self help books by Paul McKenna entitled "How to quit pirateering in 7 days").
...and so it was that Sir Walt got into conflict with some Spanish, returned back to England, and was beheaded

He seems to have fared a lot better than the 1st (or one of the 1st) colony of New World settlers which he abandoned in America though - they were all slaughtered (some very slowly) by local Indians!

Shocked



very interesting! good knowledge of it!!! Wink


It was in the book I just finished - i find it all so fascinating!
It claims that it was only thanks to Pocahontas, that the some English settlers had any chance there (although not all of them survived).
History Rocks my world! Razz


yes history is fascinating, too bad, i'm not good at european history though...
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gumtree Forum Index -> Gumtree Community Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 






Forum Terms & Conditions


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group